Kent
Has there been any progress in the IEEE on their work to produce
Ethernet related models, as was mentioned earlier on in this thread?
Tom Petch
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kent Watsen" <kwat...@juniper.net>
To: <netmod@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: [netmod] call for consensus to adopt
draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as NETMOD WG draft
[I wanted to formally close this thread, modeled after Lou's recent
closure of another draft]
This poll is complete and the document is adopted,
Authors,
Please resubmit the draft with the only change being to rename the
draft to draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang-00
Thank you!
Kent (and co-chairs)
From: netmod <netmod-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org>>
on behalf of Kent Watsen
<kwat...@juniper.net<mailto:kwat...@juniper.net>>
Date: Monday, February 29, 2016 at 6:07 PM
To: "netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>"
<netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [netmod] call for consensus to adopt
draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as NETMOD WG draft
The chairs were just reviewing notes and realized that this thread
never closed properly.
Juergen has some concerns regarding realistic milestones, that were
never addressed. Robert, can you please try to address Juergen’s
concerns now?
Also, there were only a two responses before indicating willingness to
review the draft as it progresses (thanks Dan and Martin). Can others
that support this draft and willing to review this draft say so?
Thanks,
Netmod Chairs
From: netmod <netmod-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org>>
on behalf of Kent Watsen
<kwat...@juniper.net<mailto:kwat...@juniper.net>>
Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 11:48 AM
To: "netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>"
<netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>>
Subject: [netmod] call for consensus to adopt
draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as NETMOD WG draft
The minutes for IETF 94 show that there was in-room support for
adopting draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as a WG draft. The minutes
also show that this decision would be confirmed on the mailing list,
which I am doing now.
Should we move to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as a WG item
and correspondingly add this to the WG charter as a milestone? Please
comment by Tuesday, December 22, 2015 at 9AM EST at which time the WG
Chairs will gauge whether or not there is consensus to move forward with
the document.
Thanks,
Kent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
