On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 09:44:04AM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Hi, > > this revision is based on the IETF LC. In particular, Robert Sparks suggested > in his Gen-ART LC review to include an explanation as to why we chose a YANG > extension rather than a built-in statement. I added a paragraph at the end of > Introduction, please have a look, I hope it's a fair account that shouldn't > cause any controversy. >
I think it is a feature to use extensions for new statements that do not have to be in the core. Modularity is a good thing, the YANG 1.1. specification is already 200 papges. When adding new statements, we should rather ask the question 'can this not also be done using extensions'? /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
