Hi Juergen, I think there is a miscommunication:
On 3/21/16 4:43 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: >> However this goes, it should be well documented somewhere. This will >> not be the first time this comes up (he says, knowingly). >> > I am somewhat surprised. Do people really expect that signatures > computed over a certain encoding of some data can be applied to a > different encoding of the same data? Not at all what I meant (sorry if I was confusing). I just meant that we should be explicit as to what architectural component is responsible for object signature and verification. And it would be nice if there were a few examples somewhere. Eliot
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
