> On 22 Mar 2016, at 09:10, Juergen Schoenwaelder > <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 06:10:57PM +0100, Eliot Lear wrote: >> Hi Kent, >> >> Thanks for the pointer. The zeroconf draft is cool beans to be sure. >> That describes an enrollment mechanism for devices that make use of >> 802.1AR. Very ANIMAesque. What I'm suggesting, and perhaps it's a bit >> late for this draft, is just a statement in this draft along the lines >> that "signing and verifying happens at the JSON level; see [ref] for how >> to do it", and for extra credit an example would be exceedingly cool. >> That way we as developers know what to do (again, I'm neither a JSON nor >> netmod expert - just trying to make use of what's there for what I am >> expert at (or so I think)). >> > > This I-D is an object encoding specification. Why would this document > have to talk about possible object signatures?
+1 These issues are important but they should IMO be dealt with separately. Thanks, Lada > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
