> The document, in particular in Section 6.1, could better distinguish > between the > terms "module" and "model", if an alignment with > draft-ietf-netmod-yang- model-classification is the objective. One > example where the terminology is not > entirely consistent is the sentence "add an additional example of a > Network Service YANG model as shown in Figure 4". That figure actually shows > modules.
Nice point. Does anyone have a reference for the definition of model and module in the YANG context (or I can search :-) [Qin]: The difference between data model and module is very subtle. E.g., In some case one model includes more than one module. See these two detailed definition in the section 3 of rfc7950 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7950#section-3 _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
