I think YANG identities should be standardized with 7950bis.

Mehmet

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lou Berger [mailto:lber...@labn.net]
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 12:28 PM
> To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de>;
> Mehmet Ersue <mer...@gmail.com>
> Cc: 'Kent Watsen' <kwat...@juniper.net>; netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [netmod] draft netmod charter update proposal
> 
> Juergen,
> 
> Thank you for the input.  I think your point highlights how the technical
> contents of a document drives the intended status of a document.
> 
> Lou
> 
> PS as a reminder to all, intended status of documents is *not* typically
> included in charters and are not included in the distributed version.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On March 16, 2017 2:44:53 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder
> <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 02:50:06PM +0100, Mehmet Ersue wrote:
> >
> >> That said different people including Netconf WG co-chairs think the DS
> >> concept document is Informational in nature and should be published as
> an
> >> Informational concept to be used in and adopted for the needs in
diverse
> >> protocol WGs. This is as I think also important to avoid an overlapping
> >> between NETCONF and NETMOD charters.
> >
> > The current datastore draft includes concrete YANG idenity definitions
> > for datastores and origins and these definitions better be standards
> > track.
> >
> > /js
> >
> > --
> > Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> > Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> > Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> >
> 


_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to