On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Kent Watsen <kwat...@juniper.net> wrote:

>
> Regarding the suggestion to add this text:
>
> > Guidelines for
> >  moving existing data modules to the NMDA are defined in
> >  [I-D.dsdt-nmda-guidelines].
>
> I'm hoping that we do not progress the guidelines doc.  Ideally 6087bis
> can just state what people should do, without providing a formula for
> transitioning.
>
>
I thought 6087bis is supposed to point people to the NMDA guidelines.
That is why 6087bis has been held back for so long, even though it was
supposed to be published with YANG 1.1.

We waste a lot of time refactoring drafts and re-reviewing them.
IMO the RD guidelines should be in the RD draft.




> Kent (any hat)


Andy
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to