Support publication of this draft, my same question is applied to this draft as well. Should this draft reference NMDA guideline or rfc6087bis?
-Qin -----邮件原件----- 发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Kent Watsen 发送时间: 2017年11月29日 3:43 收件人: netmod@ietf.org 抄送: netmod-cha...@ietf.org 主题: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-00 [resending] All, This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-00. Please recall that this update's intention is to modify the YANG module to be in line with the NMDA guidelines [1]. Reviewing the diff between the two drafts [2] should reveal just this. The working group last call ends on December 12. Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list. Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome! This is useful and important, even from authors. [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines-01 [2] https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-00.txt Thank you, Netmod Chairs _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
