Alex Campbell <alex.campb...@aviatnet.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed the table in section 3 has been mangled - it has extra > blank lines, entries in the wrong side of the table, and a missing > pipe in the bottom right corner.
Thanks, now fixed. The table now looks like this: +----------------------------------+--------------------------------+ | YANG data node in | IP-MIB object | | /if:interfaces/if:interface | | +----------------------------------+--------------------------------+ | ipv4 | ipv4InterfaceEnableStatus | | ipv4/enabled | ipv4InterfaceEnableStatus | | ipv4/address | ipAddressEntry | | ipv4/address/ip | ipAddressAddrType | | | ipAddressAddr | | ipv4/neighbor | ipNetToPhysicalEntry | | ipv4/neighbor/ip | ipNetToPhysicalNetAddressType | | | ipNetToPhysicalNetAddress | | ipv4/neighbor/link-layer-address | ipNetToPhysicalPhysAddress | | ipv4/neighbor/origin | ipNetToPhysicalType | | ipv6 | ipv6InterfaceEnableStatus | | ipv6/enabled | ipv6InterfaceEnableStatus | | ipv6/forwarding | ipv6InterfaceForwarding | | ipv6/address | ipAddressEntry | | ipv6/address/ip | ipAddressAddrType | | | ipAddressAddr | | ipv4/address/origin | ipAddressOrigin | | ipv6/address/status | ipAddressStatus | | ipv6/neighbor | ipNetToPhysicalEntry | | ipv6/neighbor/ip | ipNetToPhysicalNetAddressType | | | ipNetToPhysicalNetAddress | | ipv6/neighbor/link-layer-address | ipNetToPhysicalPhysAddress | | ipv6/neighbor/origin | ipNetToPhysicalType | | ipv6/neighbor/state | ipNetToPhysicalState | +----------------------------------+--------------------------------+ YANG Interface Data Nodes and Related IP-MIB Objects /martin > > Apart from that this draft looks good to me. > ________________________________________ > From: netmod <netmod-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Kent Watsen > <kwat...@juniper.net> > Sent: Wednesday, 29 November 2017 8:29 a.m. > To: netmod@ietf.org > Cc: netmod-cha...@ietf.org > Subject: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-00 > > All, > > This starts a two-week working group last call on > draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-00. > > Please recall that this update's intention is to > modify the YANG module to be in line with the NMDA > guidelines [1]. Reviewing the diff between the two > drafts [2] should reveal just this. > > The working group last call ends on December 12. > Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list. > > Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document > and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome! > This is useful and important, even from authors. > > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines-01 > [2] https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-00.txt > > Thank you, > Netmod Chairs > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod