Hi, I have reviewed draft-07 and my previous comments about NMDA have been addressed.
This might be the most important sentence in the draft: sec. 5.3 The datastore schema for <operational> MUST be a superset of the combined datastore schema used in all configuration datastores except that YANG nodes supported in a configuration datastore MAY be omitted from <operational> if a server is not able to accurately report them. The MUST implies that there is no need to design a YANG library that can support an implementation that violates this MUST (i.e., 1 schema tree for the super-set) The MAY is troublesome because it completely contradicts the conformance expressed in each YANG module supported by the server. Any data node without any if-feature-stmts is mandatory to implement. What about config=false subtrees within a config=true subtree? Can they be omitted from <operational> as well, or does the draft just intend to omit the operational value of config=true nodes? Should be specific. Perhaps this draft does not need the MAY half of the sentence at all. The YANG library can specify that it is for conformance-reporting, not conformance-defining. Andy On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net> wrote: > All, > > This starts a second working group last call on > draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores. > > As this is a 2nd LC that is focused on changes since the last LC, it > closes in *one* week. The working group last call ends on December 11. > Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list. > > At this point, we're most interested in verifying that previous comments > are addressed since the last call on the -04 rev of the draft was held. > > A summary of changes can be found at > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/DWtD12bGkBZabEygRfiwZfcnUU4 > > A diff can be found at > https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url1=draft-ietf-netmod- > revised-datastores-04.txt&url2=draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-07.txt > > Comments along the of: I have reviewed this version of the document and it > addresses my previous comments would be particularly helpful. > > Thank you, > Netmod Chairs > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
