First, I agree with Jürgen that the "target" terminology confused me, especially so given you have target-module and inline-target-spec. Like Jürgen and Rob said, "schema" seems to work better. And maybe "inline-schema-module-spec" would be clearer that the spec modifies the modules from which the schema is generated.
To the point about yang-data-ext/structure, I see instance data was very useful, but it's a must to be able to augment its metadata. YANG Catalog would use that. If this draft moves forward without sx:structure, then I think it would need to be straight YANG so that augments will work (i.e., a schema element would exist to augment). A few other comments (minor): Section 2.1: "P2 Re-use existing formats similar to the <get> operation/request" Isn't the format similar to a <get> _response_ versus the request? === Section 3 s/and and/and/ Joe _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
