+1 on schema, and the -ptr part added to my confusion.
Minor comment (which the authors probably know already): s/yang-data/structure/
Regards,
Reshad.
On 2019-03-25, 2:30 PM, "netmod on behalf of Joe Clarke"
<netmod-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of jcla...@cisco.com> wrote:
First, I agree with Jürgen that the "target" terminology confused me,
especially so given you have target-module and inline-target-spec. Like
Jürgen and Rob said, "schema" seems to work better. And maybe
"inline-schema-module-spec" would be clearer that the spec modifies the
modules from which the schema is generated.
To the point about yang-data-ext/structure, I see instance data was very
useful, but it's a must to be able to augment its metadata. YANG
Catalog would use that. If this draft moves forward without
sx:structure, then I think it would need to be straight YANG so that
augments will work (i.e., a schema element would exist to augment).
A few other comments (minor):
Section 2.1:
"P2 Re-use existing formats similar to the <get> operation/request"
Isn't the format similar to a <get> _response_ versus the request?
===
Section 3
s/and and/and/
Joe
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
