Re: [netmod] Comments on instance data draft rev -02 - Change target-module to what name?

[Balázs Lengyel]

While I agree that target might not be the best name, I want a name that describes that "these are the modules I am providing instance data for". I propose to use the terms: "content-schema" and "content defining Yang module(s)" (Sometimes I need to refer them individually.) Just schema is a too generic word. It does not tell you which schema are we speaking about? The schema for  ietf-yang-instance-data,or  the schema just for the content part? Are we speaking about individual modules or the collection of all target modules? regards Balazs On 2019. 03. 25. 14:29, Joe Clarke wrote: First, I agree with Jürgen that the "target" terminology confused me, especially so given you have target-module and inline-target-spec. Like Jürgen and Rob said, "schema" seems to work better. And maybe "inline-schema-module-spec" would be clearer that the spec modifies the modules from which the schema is generated. -- Balazs Lengyel Ericsson Hungary Ltd. Senior Specialist Mobile: +36-70-330-7909 email: balazs.leng...@ericsson.com

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod