Hi,
A couple of comments:
- As a co-author or YANG Module Tags, I'm thrilled to see it being
used/augmented by this document, but I'm not clear on how the metric and
operation type tags are to be used. To me these seem to be best defined
by the modules themselves, e.g., does a value represent an average
/sum/min/max value or the scale of the value, and not as tag meta
data. Similarly, the type of vpn supported by a tunnel also seems like
module data and not tag meta data, as this is a per tunnel instance value.
While the work was previously presented to the WG, I know you didn't
have the time we all hoped for to discuss this at the last session, so I
(personally, not as chair) would like to ask you to explain this on the
list prior to adoption. I'm hoping I'm just missing something, but from
the discussion with Juergen an Andy I suspect not.
- Since this work is derived from work that I contributed to, I'd be
interested in hearing what new mechanism(s) is/are covered by the IPR
disclosure prior to supporting WG adoption. I'm not asking in order to
debate this, as that is something for other venues, I'm merely asking
that you state for the record what new mechanism is covered.
Thank you
Lou
(as WG contributor and co-author of draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags)
On 8/17/2020 6:05 PM, Kent Watsen wrote:
This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-05
Please voice your support or objections on list before August 31.
Notes:
1) -03 was presented during the 108 session, hence the I-D has
been updated twice since then.
2) Please be aware that IPR has been filed for this I-D:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags.
Netmod Chairs
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
