This message ends this WGLC. While there seems to be general support, there doesn’t appear to be support for the provided use cases (i.e., data object tags for metric and operation type), and significant concern that a node-tag can change the definition of anything the schema.
Authors, please consider updating the draft by 1) removing and/or clarifying the concerning parts and 2) presenting compelling examples, to bring this idea forward again for a future adoption call. Thanks you, Netmod Chairs > On Aug 17, 2020, at 6:05 PM, Kent Watsen <kent+i...@watsen.net> wrote: > > This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-05 > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-05> > > Please voice your support or objections on list before August 31. > > Notes: > 1) -03 was presented during the 108 session, hence the I-D has been > updated twice since then. > 2) Please be aware that IPR has been filed for this I-D: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags > > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags>. > > Netmod Chairs > > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
