On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 12:39:38PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > >> Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > >> > Note that there is also a middle ground, namely an enumeration type > >> > factored out into an IANA maintained module that is process wise > easier > >> > to extend - should extensions be needed more regularly. > >> > >> That would suit me. How do we do that? > >> > > > You revise RFC 8366 and do the following: > > > - You define an IANA maintained module defining the enumeration type. > > This is the part that I don't know to do. > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7950.html#section-9.6 > says nothing about IANA. Is RFC7224 the model for this? > > What document am I missing here?
Yes, RFC 7224 defining the iana-if-type module may serve as a template. There are a couple of IANA maintained YANG modules, I am not sure whether we have a good place listing them all. Well, you can filter out the iana- modules from this list: https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters/ /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
