Hi, While reviewing draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-02, I had to study the type inet:uri again.
I assume that the type "uri" is supposed to mean the type that is defined by the ABNF rule "URI" in RFC 3986. If my assumption is correct I think we should make this clear in 6991bis. If my assumption is not correct, then we definitely should add some text that describes what is meant. Since (?) inet:uri is defined simply as "string" w/o any pattern, some RFCs have been published with URIs such as "D1" and "1-0-1" (RFC 8345). /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
