> On Mar 15, 2024, at 19:13, Per Andersson (perander) <peran...@cisco.com> > wrote: > > Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> on Friday, March 15, 2024 20:10: >>> On Mar 15, 2024, at 13:26, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: >>> >>> Re-, >>> I’m not sure to agree with your last statement, Andy. >>> The reality is that the OLD reco is inducing many cycles and waste of time >>> for no obvious technical reason: see an example >>> herehttps://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/eknpfAZIb9gX7GvUN1UoByCf5e4/ >>> Let’s save the authors time with a clear guidance: >>> • Pick ietf- or iana- as a function of the module >> >> I disagree with this guidance. > > Can you explain your motivation?
Well first, what has been state earlier in the thread. But basically they add almost no value and gratuitously extend what is supposed to be a short identifier. Thanks, Chris. > > > -- > Per _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
