Go go gadget google! http://netsukuku.freaknet.org/doc/main_doc/topology.pdf
So unless CJDNS's topology is _exactly_ the same as Netsukuku, I'd say pick whichever one you want. I know that you'd probably be much more appreciated here :) There is no superior case and the truth is really that pretty much nobody really has the answers. One project is not superior to the others and nobody is going to become Linus mfing Torvalds from the work they do here. Understand both systems and work toward whichever you are more curious about. Religious wars are started and maintained by trolls. Act accordingly. On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Yussi <[email protected]> wrote: > This guy is starting to convince me that to all intents and purposes ntk > and cjdns are the same thing, and ntk has not major advantages over cjdns > > > http://www.reddit.com/r/darknetplan/comments/1emjof/new_netsukuku_subreddit/ca1suwk > > Is he right? can anyone find a silver bullet that will give a reason not > to just drop ntk and go with cjdns? > _______________________________________________ > Netsukuku mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku >
_______________________________________________ Netsukuku mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
