Actually, yes, ntk is way sweeter than that, his solution for a cjd wireless mesh is basically to use ad-hoc or batman, that it... ugly!
On 20/05/13 18:37, Michael Grube wrote: > Go go gadget google! > > http://netsukuku.freaknet.org/doc/main_doc/topology.pdf > > So unless CJDNS's topology is _exactly_ the same as Netsukuku, I'd say > pick whichever one you want. I know that you'd probably be much more > appreciated here :) > > There is no superior case and the truth is really that pretty much > nobody really has the answers. One project is not superior to the others > and nobody is going to become Linus mfing Torvalds from the work they do > here. Understand both systems and work toward whichever you are more > curious about. > > Religious wars are started and maintained by trolls. Act accordingly. > > > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Yussi <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > This guy is starting to convince me that to all intents and purposes ntk > and cjdns are the same thing, and ntk has not major advantages over > cjdns > > > http://www.reddit.com/r/darknetplan/comments/1emjof/new_netsukuku_subreddit/ca1suwk > > Is he right? can anyone find a silver bullet that will give a reason not > to just drop ntk and go with cjdns? > _______________________________________________ > Netsukuku mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Netsukuku mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku _______________________________________________ Netsukuku mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
