Hi?
________________________________
From: Yussi <[email protected]>
To: Netsukuku discussion list <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 2:41:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Netsukuku] cjdns in comparison.
I've played around with it, managed to download the GPL through it's p2p
client, After a few weeks of it running i started noticing weird
connections on my LAN so I disabled it (It many not have been related),
I think it will be good.
On 20/05/13 22:34, Jaromil wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2013, Michael Grube wrote:
>
>>
>> Go go gadget google!
>> [1]http://netsukuku.freaknet.org/doc/main_doc/topology.pdf
>> So unless CJDNS's topology is _exactly_ the same as Netsukuku, I'd say
>> pick whichever one you want. I know that you'd probably be much more
>> appreciated here :)
>> There is no superior case and the truth is really that pretty much
>> nobody really has the answers. One project is not superior to the
>> others and nobody is going to become Linus mfing Torvalds from the work
>> they do here. Understand both systems and work toward whichever you are
>> more curious about.
>> Religious wars are started and maintained by trolls. Act accordingly.
>
> ahahah!! standing OV!
>
> btw anyone here has looked into GNUnet?
>
> because THAT seems VERY convincing to me, at least on paper.
>
> but then again, it is a different design.
>
> ciao
> _______________________________________________
> Netsukuku mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
_______________________________________________
Netsukuku mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
_______________________________________________
Netsukuku mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
