In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tim Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Rob Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:03:29 +0000 (GMT) Tim Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote:
> > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Drake > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Validation results aren't a guarantee of anything. > > > > > > It's a start. > > > > > > The chances are that if they can't get that bit right... > > Not really. > No, yes, really. My point is that sloppiness in one area will > indicate sloppiness in others. CSS: The Missing Manual by David Sawyer McFarland highlights the fact that all html/CSS should be processed through a validation service. I have found this useful just to clear some obvious but missed html/CSS errors. Having read this superb book I would not like to argue with him. Regards Richard
