In a mad moment - Steve Fryatt mumbled : > On 28 Apr, Tim Powys-Lybbe wrote in message > <mpro.lkd2te00002hm0068....@powys.org>:
>> On 28 Apr at 11:26, Steve Fryatt <li...@stevefryatt.org.uk> wrote: >> >>> Just download the current build. You can see what rev it's up to from >>> the entries under "Recent SVN Activity" further down the page: as I >>> write this, the latest entry there is still r12243. However, as Richard >>> says, later builds (ie ones with higher 'r' numbers) will still contain >>> the same changes unless one of the developers specifically undoes them >>> again for some reason. >> >> And the last sentence confirms the problem. There is no means of actually >> downloading any specific revision number and instructions to do so are >> plain misleading. Or do I have this wrong? > Why would you want to download r12243 specifically? You were advised to try > r12243: that version or any later one will do[1]. In effect, being told to > "try rXXXXX" means -- to all intents and purposes -- "download a new test > build and try it". I have just tried r12243 on an RPC (RO 402)and can confirm the general (subjective) feeling that it is a fair bit faster, except for heavily image laden pages. Great work lads! and Thank You. -- |) [ |)ryn [vans mail to - brynev...@bryork.freeuk.com
