In article <out-50f5c18e.md-1.4.17.chris.yo...@unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk>, Chris Young <chris.yo...@unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk> wrote:
> I'm not sure I necessarily agree with this workaround - a website > deciding that everything running ARM must want the mobile version of a > page is making a pretty big assumption I decided there was no good reason for leaking processor architecture information anyway. -- Michael Drake (tlsa) http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
