unusual answer, perhaps...

On 10/01/2024 13:11, Joseph Rabie via nettime-l wrote:
A question, that this seems to point in the direction of, is that of leadership 
and its worthiness.
I suggest groups of older women as leaders: hag-o-cracy.
Considering it a given to have to choose a leader, or accept one being imposed, 
to whom one is willing to cede all personal responsibility.
this is a very centralised & hierarchical & authoritarian view on "leadership".

there can be poly-centric leaders, at different times within social circle, or for various activities, or for different regional scopes...

Or using "consensus-based" leadership... https://wiki.techinc.nl/Hackers_tribes#Consensus

Where are the Mandelas, those who bring wisdom to the job and truly represent 
human decency?
they are here: Mia Mottley, the Prime Minister of Barbados, and Sheik Hasina, prime minister of Bangladesh

also: Vandana Shiva, Riane Eisler, Silvia Federici, Elizabeth Kolbert...

& many other https://wiki.techinc.nl/Female_experts

plus

grandmothers ruling societies has been proven survival strategy for millennia
(200.000 BC to 10.000BC).

there are many examples in literature & fiction;

Starhawk: The Fifth Sacred Thing: https://starhawk.org/writing/books/the-fifth-sacred-thing/

Ursula Le Guin https://www.themarginalian.org/2023/09/30/ursula-k-le-guin-menopause/

Heather Marsh: http://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2013/05/24/binding-chaos/

Dr Sharon Blackie: Hagitude https://hagitude.org

and in current tribes & indigenous cultures, via anthropologists & paleontologists...

https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/o/camilla-power-10728753218#events



grumpily yours,
Vesna


--
https://becha.unciv.nl
https://social.v.st/web/@becha/

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: https://www.nettime.org
# contact: [email protected]

Reply via email to