[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > While "-o all" is not bad in an absolute sense, in a relative sense, it is > > not as user-friendly as "-v", nor anywhere near as common. > > As I previously pointed out, ZFS has also adopted the "-o all" convention. > It seems a reasonable convention to me for applications that support "-o". > Having both "-o all" and "-v" is possible but deeply offends the minimalist > in me.
This isn't ZFS, though. It's yet another networking command, and in the family of networking commands (e.g., netstat), "-o <field>" is just unknown. -- James Carlson, KISS Network <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
