>>> c. Since link properties are all initialized by the new mechanism, do >>> we still need the dladm_init_linkprop() calls in various RCM modules >>> and libdladm function calls (for example, i_dladm_aggr_up())? >> >> Will file a CR. >> > Why don't fix it now?
Because it will require more code reviewers, more testing, delay integration even further and upset our very patient management. These calls do not hurt, they are just extra fat that can be removed later. >>> Also, is it possible for "dladm init-linkprop" to take one specific >>> name (which requires the changes in the do_init_linkprop() function)? >> >> Yes, the code is already there. >> > My question was: when dladm init-linkprop takes a specific link name? When invoked manually or via a custom script. Generally useful to developers like me. > Another problem I just think about. Do you need something similar to > dls_devnet_prop_complete() when mac_open_by_linkid() is called? Or > probably in dls_devnet_hold_tmp()? I don't know... Do we? -Artem _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
