Peter Memishian wrote: > > >>> c. Since link properties are all initialized by the new mechanism, do > > >>> we still need the dladm_init_linkprop() calls in various RCM modules > > >>> and libdladm function calls (for example, i_dladm_aggr_up())? > > >> > > >> Will file a CR. > > >> > > > Why don't fix it now? > > > > Because it will require more code reviewers, more testing, delay > > integration even further and upset our very patient management. These > > calls do not hurt, they are just extra fat that can be removed later. > > I disagree. Those calls will lead to confusion. Part of adding a proper > persistence model for properties includes removing the old incomplete > mechanism.
OK. I'd surely hate to cause confusion in anyone, so I will remove the old incomplete mechanism. thanks, -Artem _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
