On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 01:22:06PM -0400, Rishi Srivatsavai wrote:
> Code review request for the RBridges project. RBridges project
> is delivering layer-2 Bridging and TRILL support in Solaris.

Rishi,

My comments are below.

Cheers,
Anders

----------------------------------------------------------------------

uts/common/net/trill.h

* 105-106: Indentation is a level off

* 107: Do you not need CONSTCOND to keep lint happy?

uts/common/io/trill_impl.h

* Should it be moved to uts/common/net?

uts/common/io/trill.c

* General: Sockfs does not serialize socket operations, so it is possible
  for your socket module to receive multiple bind requests at the same time,
  or receive an unbind while a write()/ioctl() is going on. It looks like
  you need to add some logic to ensure that ts_link is not set to NULL while
  doing, for example, write(). Similarly, ts_link is set to NULL when the
  link is going away, but there does not look like there is any guard to
  make sure a write is not active.

* 102: Why does the message length impact the ethernet type? Should it not
  always be TRILL (in the non-VLAN case)?

* 175: Consider adding ASSERT(RW_LOCK_HELD(...))

* 871: Please add a trill_ prefix

* 900-901: Just use kstat_named_init()

* 917: Whether you can use KM_SLEEP in the 'create' downcall depends on the
  flags that are passed to the downcall. Sleeping is only OK if SOCKET_SLEEP
  is set. 

* 1128-1319: Please use ddi_copyin/copyout instead of so_copyin/copyout.

* 1135, 1174, 1189: remove extra white space

* 1371: Please split this into two statements

* 1377: It is the responsibility of the socket module to enforce
  receive side flow control. When su_recv returns -1, that indicates that
  the buffer is full and that you should stop pushing up data. Sorry about
  the lack of documentation, but please have a look at udp_ulp_recv().

* 1437-1460: connect() binds to the destination address, which
  is rather odd. Does 'connect' even make sense for AF_TRILL sockets? And if
  you get rid of 'connect', then you can just remove 'shutdown' as well.

* 1533-1583: Depending on when you integrate, you might want to remove these
  and use the "noops" that Darren will make available in his PF_PACKET push.

_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to