On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 11:21 -0600, Steven Stallion wrote: > +1 for keeping snoop. > > snoop presents a minimal quick and dirty method of inspecting packets; this > has been invaluable during network driver development over a serial > console.
I don't think that snoop is the only quick and dirty method of inspecting pacets, so that in itself is not an argument for keeping it. Both tshark and tcpdump also do this (and better). IMO a more compelling reason to keep it is the large set of entities out there that depend on its input and output formats. -Seb _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
