Brian Utterback wrote:
Steven Stallion wrote:
+1 for keeping snoop.
snoop presents a minimal quick and dirty method of inspecting
packets; this
has been invaluable during network driver development over a serial
console.
Is there anything that snoop provides in this regard that tshark does
not? I suspect that once you give it a try, you will find that tshark
works as well or better for your needs.
I'm aware of only one thing snoop provides that tshark does not:
familiarity for people who've been using Solaris for a very long time. :-)
Eliminating snoop at this time is not practical. I think "abandoning"
snoop shouldn't happen at least until we have had a significant release
cycle that included an alternative. As it stands, there has not yet
been an actual production release that included wireshark.
- Garrett
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]