Did you change the color or grayscale depth between the two?

T

----- Original Message -----
From: "Anne Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 7:23 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Thumbnail view puzzler


Could be - but pic00039 and pic00039a were both edited and re-written by
Gimp, so if the compression was being changed I would have expected it to be
so in both pics.

Anne

On Wednesday 06 Nov 2002 12:20 pm, you wrote:
> Anne,
>
> I haven't got around to trying to view many images under MDK that were
made
> elsewhere (camera, webcam or under a different O/S). But, I have
> experienced oodles of problems in Windows working with bitmaps under
> several graphics programs and with files that came from other O/S (like
> Macs). If I am going to have any problems, it seems to be from either
> compression or 'bit-depth'. you can make a BMP file at carious bit-depths
> (2-bit, 8-bit, 24-bit, etc.). Some programs can't handle all the
> combinations. However, if you are starting out with images from a digital
> camera, they are most likely compressed BMPs. Could it be possible that
> your editing program is able to handle compressed BMPs and therefore opens
> them properly to allow for editing, but KView cannot understand the
> compression scheme used by yoour camera and therefore making them
> unviewable until you remove it?
>
> T
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anne Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 6:58 AM
> Subject: Re: [newbie] Thumbnail view puzzler
>
> On Wednesday 06 Nov 2002 10:53 am, you wrote:
> > Anne Wilson wrote:
> >  >On Tuesday 05 Nov 2002 10:53 pm, you wrote:
> >  >>Anne Wilson wrote:
> >  >>>On Tuesday 05 Nov 2002 6:38 pm, you wrote:
> >  >>>>Anne Wilson wrote:
> >  >>>>>I use KView's ability to display thumbnails, when working
> >
> > with images,
> >
> >  >>>>>but have come across a real puzzler.  In the large batch of
> >
> > photos I'm
> >
> >  >>>>>working with, two directories contain .jpg and .bmp images.
> >
> > Some of the
> >
> >  >>>>>.bmps were written by a windows program, and some by gPhoto.
> >
> >   The .jpgs
> >
> >  >>>>>display as thumbnails, but the .bmps don't.
> >  >>>>>
> >  >>>>>In a third directors there are images that were captured
> >
> > from video by a
> >
> >  >>>>>windows application, then trimmed in Gimp.  These all show
> >
> > as .BMP.
> >
> >  >>>>>These images do display as thumbnails.
> >  >>>>>
> >  >>>>>All three directories are subdirectories in a fat32
> >
> > partition, so
> >
> >  >>>>>renaming *.bmp to *.BMP makes no difference.
> >  >>>>>
> >  >>>>>Any ideas, anyone?
> >  >>>>>
> >  >>>>>Anne
> >  >>>>
> >  >>>>What about the name of the files ?
> >  >>>>
> >  >>>>John
> >  >>>
> >  >>>Non-displaying ones are in the order of pic00003.bmp and
> >
> > displaying ones
> >
> >  >>>are Svid003.BMP.
> >  >>>
> >  >>>Anne
> >  >>
> >  >>Well I'm not familiar with those file names as such but I do
> >
> > know many
> >
> >  >>windblows file names have to be changed, that is what jhead and
> >
> > chcase
> >
> >  >>are there for, but just as
> >  >>an experiment try changing the name to something all lowercase
> >
> > and see what
> >
> >  >>happens.
> >  >>john
> >  >
> >  >Wouldn't that be counter-productive?  It's the mixed case ones
> >
> > that do
> >
> >  >display correctly.
> >  >
> >  >BTW, the pic* names are because that's the way the smartmedia
> >
> > card names its
> >
> >  >.jpg files, and I use .bmp when processing them to avoid further
> >
> > degradation.
> >
> >  > The Svid* files are a user'defined prefix from the video
> >
> > capture software.
> >
> >  >Anne
> >
> > All I can go on is my experiences with Windblows files , and any
> > Johnfiles that
> > were higher case I had to rename in all lower case to work in
> > linux, and
> > to that end chcase and jhead did the job.
>
> I'm beginning to think that the answer is much more simple.  pic00039.bmp
> does not display, but pic00039a.bmp, which is a heavily cropped version,
> does.  Is it simply a matter of size?  I think it may be, since the camer
> pics are much larger than the video pics that display OK.  Later, I'll try
> some cropping to test this theory.
>
> Anne
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>- ----
>
>
> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to