On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 17:07:25 -0700, Charlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 04 February 2003 04:38 pm, et wrote: > > a post a few days ago got me to thinking, I would like to see what scores > > different video cards and chipsets and mem give on glx gears > > my Geforce 4, Nvidia drivers from the club, dual P3 1000, 512 mem > > 4721 frames in 5.000 seconds = 944.200 FPS > > 4738 frames in 5.000 seconds = 947.600 FPS > > 4556 frames in 5.000 seconds = 911.200 FPS > > _This is *bad.*_ <g> > > 689 frames in 5.0 seconds = 137.800 FPS > 600 frames in 5.0 seconds = 120.000 FPS > 500 frames in 5.0 seconds = 100.000 FPS > 700 frames in 5.0 seconds = 140.000 FPS > 600 frames in 5.0 seconds = 120.000 FPS > > Hardware: > Creative Graphics Blaster (NVidia) 16 MB > Pentium 3 (just one ;->) 500 MHz > 768 MB SDRAM > ABit BX6 Rev. 2 (440 BX chipset) > > Ya fee better now Ed? LMAO > > Regards; > -- > Charlie > Edmonton,AB,Canada
When comparing glxgears stats, make sure you're all running the same screen resolution and colour depth, and maximise the glxgears window. Things like these can make a big difference to performance. -- Sridhar Dhanapalan [Yama | http://www.pclinuxonline.com/] "GNU make is possibly the only example of "overkill" to rival GNU emacs" -- Linus Torvalds
msg118165/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
