On Tuesday 04 February 2003 07:26 pm, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote: > On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 17:07:25 -0700, Charlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 04 February 2003 04:38 pm, et wrote: > > > a post a few days ago got me to thinking, I would like to see what > > > scores different video cards and chipsets and mem give on glx gears > > > my Geforce 4, Nvidia drivers from the club, dual P3 1000, 512 mem > > > 4721 frames in 5.000 seconds = 944.200 FPS > > > 4738 frames in 5.000 seconds = 947.600 FPS > > > 4556 frames in 5.000 seconds = 911.200 FPS > > > > _This is *bad.*_ <g> > > > > 689 frames in 5.0 seconds = 137.800 FPS > > 600 frames in 5.0 seconds = 120.000 FPS > > 500 frames in 5.0 seconds = 100.000 FPS > > 700 frames in 5.0 seconds = 140.000 FPS > > 600 frames in 5.0 seconds = 120.000 FPS > > > > Hardware: > > Creative Graphics Blaster (NVidia) 16 MB > > Pentium 3 (just one ;->) 500 MHz > > 768 MB SDRAM > > ABit BX6 Rev. 2 (440 BX chipset) > > > > Ya fee better now Ed? LMAO > > > > Regards; > > -- > > Charlie > > Edmonton,AB,Canada > > When comparing glxgears stats, make sure you're all running the same screen > resolution and colour depth, and maximise the glxgears window. Things like > these can make a big difference to performance. I really did not intend any sort of scientific endevor here... but this made me think,,, what if I go glx gears in full screen, open the gimp, scan a photo, burn a cd, open star office and open office and kpresentor and bcast2000. 2865 frames in 5.000 seconds = 573.000 FPS 475 frames in 36.764 seconds = 12.920 FPS 451 frames in 52.893 seconds = 8.527 FPS 2261 frames in 5.001 seconds = 452.110 FPS no one should follow my lead.. I am a sick pup....
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
