On Wednesday 25 Jun 2003 3:19 pm, Technoslick wrote: > On Wednesday 25 June 2003 08:11 am, Stephen Kuhn graced me with: > > I'd venture to say it's got something to do with 1.) the amount > > of bookmarks, 2.) file system performance and 3.) HD > > optimisation. > > > > (Then again, I always say that, don't I?) > > Stephen! That's not fair! You covered all your bases with that > shotgun approach. ;0) > > I don't doubt all those contribute to my problem. However, I was > wondering about the way KDE stores and indexes (if any) the > bookmarks. I haven't had the time to sort through all the imported > links, but many were three levels down, and therefore are up to > four levels down now. Maybe, KDE has a problem working with that > kind of hierarchy? > > I have to sort though all these links, anyway. Many are now dead. > As I reorganize them, dropping the dead and no longer intersting > ones, I hope to find a workable compromise. > Well, I think I can rule out one possibility. I have several bookmarks at level 4 and one at level5. I've just checked it, and it's functioning normally.
I'd say that it's the sheer number of bookmarks combined with resources. As a test, could you copy your bookmarks file to a backup, then simply delete half of them. If it's just numbers that will tell you. If you still have a problem there's something else involved. Anne
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
