On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 09:37, Todd Slater wrote: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 12:43:55AM -0300, Josenildo Marques wrote: > > On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 00:34, Todd Slater wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 12:13:05AM -0300, Josenildo Marques wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 03 September 2003 19:40, Todd Slater wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 06:50:26PM -0300, Josenildo Marques wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I tried the rename script, but I can't get the date to appear, even using > > > > > > the - -d switch... > > > > > > > > > > > > TIA > > > > > > > > > > you're talking about the script I sent for John, or getpix? Do you have > > > > > the exif package? (urpmi exif) > > > > > > > > Yes, that one. I installed exif before running it. > > > > > > My guess is that your camera might not use exif headers, then? What > > > happens if you do: > > > > > > exif -t DateTimeOriginal yourpicture.jpg > > > > > > That should give some output with the last line being a value of the > > > date and time the picture was taken. Let's see what that gives. > > > > > > Todd > > > > Nothing happened. > > Perhaps I wasn't clear in my answer. I was referring to the rename.sh > > script. > > Right, and rename.sh calls exif to determine the date (contained in the > exif header) the picture was taken. Running exif alone would give you > some output you could use to troubleshoot. If you try "exif > yourpicture.jpg" you might get even more info. > > > My camera is a quasi-camera. It must be an old model. > > Don't bother, Todd. It's good enough as it is. > > That might be it, then. Still, I'd like to confirm that it doesn't use > exif headers. > > Todd
Sorry. I forgot to mention one more thing. The file command shows the following: cyberhades: ~/$ file IMG_0001.JPG IMG_0001.JPG: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, aspect ratio, 1 x 1
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
