Paul,
I wasn't able to get any of that working in 4.30. All that was working was
the basic functionality of Pine. No colors, no threading...it was pretty
plain vanilla. I wasn't able to get it to compile either. That was
strange. I installed the precompiled binaries. I'm glad I saved the old
binaries as renaming, cause I was able to reinstall them quickly.
So, what things did you have to do to set everything up to get it working
the way you wanted?
--
Mark
/ * Sometimes it becomes necessary to rock the boat
* in order to get the rats up from below decks
* so they can be kicked over the side and drowned!
*
* REGISTERED LINUX USER # 182496
*/
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<*REPLY SEPERATOR*>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Thu, 23 Nov 2000 Paul had this to say!
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Roger Sherman wrote:
>
> Good thing that I did not trash this like all things about Aurora...
>
> >>I see from your sig line that you've a different version of Pine than
> >>normal. Is there a new version of Pine out? Are there are reasons or
> >>features in it that would warrent moving from 4.21 to 4.30? I love Pine
> >>and there are a few things I've been looking forward to finding in Pine
> >>one day. Like threading and a few others...
> >
> >
> >Thats funny, Mark...I was going to ask you about that. I was on the
> >Pine homepage, and saw the updates, and was wondering what you thought
> >of them...
>
> Pine 4.30 works fine for me. There are a few things I have not worked out
> yet. I pulled the source tarball from the site and compiled it myself.
> Threading works pretty good. As you may have seen in another mail, there
> was a little problem with colors, but that settled itself easily.
> What I am wondering about is how to get URL's highlighted. 4.21 (which
> came as RPM) did so, but I guess I either miss something, or forgot some
> option while compiling the thing.
>
> All in all I like it :)
>
> Paul
>
>
