First things first again, thankyou all for responding so quickly. I have looked into trying your solutions posted in the past Sridhar, but still to no resault. I am not a very good writer but I will try to outline the things I've tried and the questions I have a little better. First of all having dealt with widows so long I'm used to dealing with the simplified language of the 9x environment. In 'netconf' when it asked for 'host + domain' I asumed that it meant 'csXXXXXX-a' + 'ssdt1.sk.wave.home.com'. Unfortunatly that didn't fit, so I placed 'csXXXXXX-a' by it's self and the 'ssdt1.sk.wave.home.com' I place in the primary domain under dns ip and stuff. Then I tried the 'dhcpcd -d -n -h hostname eth0', and this didn't change anything. 'ifconfig -a' listed no ip and no packets sent, and I was unable to ping even my 9x ip on the same hub. So, I removed linux and reinstalled 98 got networking up did a 'ipconfig /all' to get all the ip's for dns, my ip, gateway, even dhcp server. It was here that I saw the name 'csXXXXXX-a.ss.shawcable.net'. So I went back and manualy configured everything, and still no luck. then using 'csXXXXXX-a.ss.shawcable.net' I tried again to get 'dhcpcd -d -n -h hostname eth0' to work. Finally I reset up my networking manually using 'csXXXXXX-a.ss.shawcable.net'. Nothing seems to work, and I know it is recognizing my ethernet card. I'm lost and kinda confused. I know my ethernet card is a 10/100... could it be trying to run it at 100 only? The kernal being used is 'eepro100'. Thanks again guy's for your assistance...
|
- [newbie] Drew
- [newbie] unsubsribe NeoMatrix
- [newbie] Ernesto Bayona Rivero
- [newbie] UDDANE
- Re: [newbie] Rick Schultz
- Re: [newbie] UDDANE
- Re: [newbie] Ricky Schultz
- Re: [newbie] UDDANE
- [newbie] Tea Pot
- [newbie] ben shahbaz
- [newbie] Shane Roppel
- [newbie] Derek Field
- [newbie] keldmar
- Re: [newbie] AndyMonks
- [newbie] Andrei Raevsky
- [newbie] Luis Miguel Contreras
- [newbie] Techsupport
- [newbie] LinuxMaxx
- [newbie] Vic Meakin
- RE: [newbie] falcaraz
- Re: [newbie] Vic Meakin