I would just like to have a "TO:" column. Yes there is a "TO:" field but it's nice to see it in a column next to Subject, Sender, Date where you can quickly pan up and down. And yes I could use the filter option to split up the emails according to its "TO:" field. But when you have well over twenty email accounts & hundreds of emails everyday, getting these 'little' things makes a big difference in handling the volume of mail that I get.
Sevatio On Wednesday 24 October 2001 05:59am, you wrote: > In fact, both Kmail and Netscape does have a "TO:" field to use to > filter. Maybe you didn't really look that closely, because you > *believed* that it didn't. > > But I dun get you when you say there's no "TO:" field. I can see the > "TO:" field for all my emails. Do you mean when it's listing the emails > on top, it only lists the subject, sender, etc of the emails the "TO:" > field is not one of the things they list? > > Besides, I would say many people don't need the "TO:" field to decide > whether the email is junk or not. The sender and subject already tells > enough. I usually trash away emails before I arrive at the "TO:" field > anyways. > > Sevatio wrote: > > Good idea but your suggestion implies that there is a "TO:" field. Kmail > > doesn't have a "TO:" field to make use of a filter. Or am I not > > understanding what you're saying? > > > > Sevatio ---------------------------------------- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; name="message.footer" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Description: ----------------------------------------
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
