Ciao 380, Il 24 Aprile 2024 17:40:49 CEST, "380°" <g...@biscuolo.net> ha scritto: > > > It is expressly forbidden to contribute to Gentoo any content that has been > > created > > with the assistance of Natural Language Processing artificial intelligence > > tools. > > This motion can be revisited, should a case been made over such a tool that > > does not > > pose copyright, ethical and quality concerns. > > e questa sarebbe una policy /actionable/?!?
Lo è tanto quanto quella prevista per contribuire al kernel di Linux, cui è letteralmente richiesto gli sviluppatori di (auto)certificare che ``` a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I have the right to submit it under the open source license indicated in the file; or b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source license and I have the right under that license to submit that work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part by me, under the same open source license (unless I am permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated in the file; or c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified it ``` https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#developer-s-certificate-of-origin-1-1 > non ho parole Lo capisco: il codice prodotto da un LLM non può garantire di soddisfare nessuna delle precedenti clausole. La policy di Gentoo rende solo esplicito ciò che il più diffuso Developer’s Certificate of Origin già richiede. Come fa Linux a impedire che codice che violi quelle condizioni entri nel kernel? Esattamente come farà Gentoo. ;-) Giacomo _______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa@server-nexa.polito.it https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa
