It's not broken by default, you pick how you want it to behave when you install it. If you choose the wrong option *for your situation* then it would *appear* to be broken. The installer is pretty explicit in the behaviour of the options, and it's a one time thing. I wouldn't consider it *broken* by any stretch of the imagination. Awkward, annoying? perhaps; broken? no.
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Diego Mijelshon <[email protected]>wrote: > You read that correctly. I don't like software that's broken by default. > > Diego > > > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:53, James Gregory <[email protected]>wrote: > >> You don't like git based on the fact you have to set a single setting on >> install? Wow. I'll get my coat. >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Diego Mijelshon >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I don't like Git... its handling of newlines makes me cry (seriously? I >>> have to manually configure that so it doesn't break in 2010?) >>> >>> Anyway, and opening the scope of the conversation a little, today we have >>> a fragmented NH home: part is in SF, part in NHForge, and part in a Jira >>> hosted somewhere else (there are probably good historical reasons for this, >>> but it's annoying, especially for new users) >>> It would be nice to have a single home, regardless of where it is. >>> >>> Diego >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:44, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Diego, >>>> Git is not supported neither by GoogleCode nor CodePlex. >>>> Both, GoogleCode (the saint water) and CodePlex (the devil), gives >>>> support to Mercurial. >>>> SourceForge give support to all and there is no reason to move the prj >>>> somewhere else. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Diego Mijelshon < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> We (I'm talking like I was part of the team :-D) could also move it to >>>>> Google Code. Or Codeplex (just kidding, I hate it). >>>>> >>>>> Diego >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:35, James Gregory >>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> A big part of the benefit of switching an open-source project to Git >>>>>> is the ability to use Github. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> We can switch to Git or to Mercurial without move from SourceForge >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Torkel Ödegaard < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A move to github would be great. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> /Torkel >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On May 29, 8:27 pm, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> > btw NH is NH. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > @Patrick >>>>>>>> > I saw your frenetic contribution in our JIRA. >>>>>>>> > Thanks for your patches. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Tuna Toksoz <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> > > I guess this shift will not be in far future. Fabio started >>>>>>>> migrating >>>>>>>> > > projects he lead to Mercurial already :) >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > > Tuna Toksöz >>>>>>>> > > Eternal sunshine of the open source mind. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz >>>>>>>> > >http://tunatoksoz.com >>>>>>>> > >http://twitter.com/tehlike >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Patrick Earl < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >> could use the tools DVCSs provide. It would make it much >>>>>>>> easier >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > -- >>>>>>>> > Fabio Maulo >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Fabio Maulo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Fabio Maulo >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
