James,
I have all my stuff in git, and I routinely have to explain that to other
users.

On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 6:49 PM, James Gregory <[email protected]>wrote:

> It's not broken by default, you pick how you want it to behave when you
> install it. If you choose the wrong option *for your situation* then it
> would *appear* to be broken. The installer is pretty explicit in the
> behaviour of the options, and it's a one time thing. I wouldn't consider it
> *broken* by any stretch of the imagination. Awkward, annoying? perhaps;
> broken? no.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Diego Mijelshon <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> You read that correctly. I don't like software that's broken by default.
>>
>>    Diego
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:53, James Gregory <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> You don't like git based on the fact you have to set a single setting on
>>> install? Wow. I'll get my coat.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Diego Mijelshon 
>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't like Git... its handling of newlines makes me cry (seriously? I
>>>> have to manually configure that so it doesn't break in 2010?)
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, and opening the scope of the conversation a little, today we
>>>> have a fragmented NH home: part is in SF, part in NHForge, and part in a
>>>> Jira hosted somewhere else (there are probably good historical reasons for
>>>> this, but it's annoying, especially for new users)
>>>> It would be nice to have a single home, regardless of where it is.
>>>>
>>>>    Diego
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:44, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Diego,
>>>>> Git is not supported neither by GoogleCode nor CodePlex.
>>>>> Both, GoogleCode (the saint water) and CodePlex (the devil), gives
>>>>> support to Mercurial.
>>>>> SourceForge give support to all and there is no reason to move the prj
>>>>> somewhere else.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Diego Mijelshon <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> We (I'm talking like I was part of the team :-D) could also move it to
>>>>>> Google Code. Or Codeplex (just kidding, I hate it).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Diego
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:35, James Gregory 
>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A big part of the benefit of switching an open-source project to Git
>>>>>>> is the ability to use Github.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We can switch to Git or to Mercurial without move from SourceForge
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Torkel Ödegaard <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A move to github would be great.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /Torkel
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On May 29, 8:27 pm, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> > btw NH is NH.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > @Patrick
>>>>>>>>> > I saw your frenetic contribution in our JIRA.
>>>>>>>>> > Thanks for your patches.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Tuna Toksoz <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> > > I guess this shift will not be in far future. Fabio started
>>>>>>>>> migrating
>>>>>>>>> > > projects he lead to Mercurial already :)
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > > Tuna Toksöz
>>>>>>>>> > > Eternal sunshine of the open source mind.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > >http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz
>>>>>>>>> > >http://tunatoksoz.com
>>>>>>>>> > >http://twitter.com/tehlike
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Patrick Earl <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > >> could use the tools DVCSs provide.  It would make it much
>>>>>>>>> easier
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>> > Fabio Maulo
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Fabio Maulo
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Fabio Maulo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to