Which is, I think, the core of the user's issue: lack of clarity within the legal profession about all of this in the first place.
My takeaways: - NH is (definitely) licensed under LGPL - NH is (maybe!) licensed under LGPLv2.1 - it might be possible to change the NH license - nobody has any clear (legal) idea about how to change the NH license - its not clear that there is any advantage (to anyone!) in changing the NH license - based on what the original questioner was wanting to do, its clear that at least in the confines of "common interpretation of LGPLv2.1" -- which may *or may not* be the license under which NH is presently covered -- they are not likely to run afoul of what might be the present license constraints :) My conclusion: leave well-enough alone :P Steve Bohlen [email protected] http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com http://twitter.com/sbohlen On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Wenig, Stefan <[email protected]>wrote: > > Sadly, asking a lawyer isn't really going to help, as lawyers too > > have different opinions about this. > > Not true. An honest lawyer will always give you the same answer: it depends > ;-) >
