On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 09:00, Patrick Earl <[email protected]> wrote: > While I originally preferred Mercurial, I've changed my view, and now use > GIT, for these reasons: > > 1. Though subjective, Git still seems to be more powerful and popular. >
Maybe in option count, but I adhere to the "less is more" philosophy. Hg has less noise. > 2. Castle selected Git. > 3. Mono selected Git. > 4. There is NGit, an active .NET implementation of Git. > And...? > 5. The windows support is fine in TortoiseGIT (just like TortoiseSVN). > While I do on occasion have to run a command at the command line, routine > operations work well from the Tortoise GUI, just like TortoiseSVN. > There's TortoiseHg. Same thing here. > 6. Git tends to be supported first in places like continous integration > servers. > So does Hg (TeamCity supports it, at least) Diego
