sorry NUnit is in launchpad. On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
> Moq svn (Google code) > NServiceBus svn + git (Source forge + GitHub) <== Official in SVN > Rhino.ServiceBus git (GitHub) > uNhAddIns Hg (Google code) > SharpTestsEx Hg (Code Plex) > ConfORM Hg (Google Code) > NUnit svn (SourceForge) > Castle git (GitHub) > Spring svn (custom) > NHibernate svn (SourceForge) > NHibernate.Validator svn (SourceForge) > NHibernate.Spatial svn (SourceForge) > NHibernate.Search svn (SourceForge) > NewtonJson svn (CodePlex) > Log4Net svn (Apache) > Lucene svn (Apache) > Re-Linq svn (custom + CodePlex only for deploy) > ANTLR svn (Custom) > SharpMap svn (Code Plex) > > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I mean popular in the sense that out of the .NET projects that I follow >> that uses DVCS, most use Git. >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I know lot of OSS using SVN more than Git... btw.. >>> Mercurial is supported by Bitbucket, Google Code, SourceForge, CodePlex >>> Please give me a more detailed definition of "popular" since its >>> translation in Italian and in Spanish can be interpreted as "not used only >>> by elite". >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Diego, >>>> I know of a LOT of OSS projects which are using Git >>>> I know of very few using HG. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Diego Mijelshon <[email protected] >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Oren, >>>>> >>>>> What stats do you use to say Git is more popular? >>>>> I think they both have lots of followers. >>>>> >>>>> I'm slightly biased towards HG, because it has an easier learning curve >>>>> and it doesn't have the "non-native" feel of Git on Windows. >>>>> Regarding the specific points you mentioned: aren't those just Github >>>>> features whose current implementation you like instead of Hg/Git >>>>> differences? >>>>> >>>>> In any case, here's my 2c regarding source: >>>>> >>>>> - There seems to be a consensus to move to a DVCS. Nobody wants to >>>>> stay with SVN >>>>> - As others said, after the release might be a good time to do the >>>>> move >>>>> - IMO, the decision should be done first by the committers and, if >>>>> there isn't a clear winner, by the contributors. How about a poll? >>>>> >>>>> And regarding the site (in no particular order): >>>>> >>>>> - I've said it before: the current state of NH identity is just >>>>> terrible. Searches for "nhibernate" "nhibernate source" "nhibernate bug >>>>> tracker" "nhibernate docs" and "nhibernate binaries" should all point >>>>> to a >>>>> unified site. >>>>> - I don't have anything against Jira per se, but having it redirect >>>>> to an IP is just unprofessional >>>>> - SourceForge still feels like 1999. I really like Google Code, I >>>>> dislike CodePlex, and GitHub is meh. But the decision should be made by >>>>> those in charge of maintaining it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Diego >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 08:03, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Frans, >>>>>> Git is more popular than hg. And we aren't considering centralized SCM >>>>>> >>>>>> And yes, there is a HUGE difference between sending a patch and >>>>>> sending a pull request. >>>>>> >>>>>> a) it is *significantly* easier to handle a pull request, because it >>>>>> is a single command, rather than a set of operations >>>>>> b) it allows you to have your own fork and easily merge future changes >>>>>> c) it means that Joe can pull from you, not just from the master feed >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Frans Bouma <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> > I actually do have a problem with hg. I think that Git is: >>>>>>> > a) more popular >>>>>>> >>>>>>> than what, subversion? Perforce? CVS? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > b) GitHub has tremendous pull in terms of encouraging >>>>>>> contributions. >>>>>>> > c) I saw a huge spike in the amount of people contributing once I >>>>>>> moved to >>>>>>> > github. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have a hard time believing that the scc system used is of >>>>>>> any >>>>>>> relevance whether a developer is capable of contributing any code. I >>>>>>> mean: >>>>>>> it's not as if someone who changes some code in his own branch is >>>>>>> suddenly >>>>>>> able to commit those changes as well: the change has to be reviewed, >>>>>>> tested, >>>>>>> agreed upon and then it's committed. A svn patch is just as simple >>>>>>> for that >>>>>>> than any other patch. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't deny what you saw on ravendb stuff, I just find it a >>>>>>> 'coincidence' rather than a correlated event. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> FB >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > And move the code in CodePlex... >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > -- >>>>>>> > Fabio Maulo >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > El 02/11/2010, a las 16:38, Jorge <[email protected]> >>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > Hello there, >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > I am in the process of downloading the code via SVN, and it >>>>>>> is >>>>>>> > taking >>>>>>> > > a very long time. >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > Can someone please enable Git repo in sourceforge, or >>>>>>> better yet, >>>>>>> > move >>>>>>> > > code to Github? >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > Respectfully yours, >>>>>>> > > Jorge >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Fabio Maulo >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Fabio Maulo > > -- Fabio Maulo
