Diego, I know of a LOT of OSS projects which are using Git I know of very few using HG.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Diego Mijelshon <[email protected]>wrote: > Oren, > > What stats do you use to say Git is more popular? > I think they both have lots of followers. > > I'm slightly biased towards HG, because it has an easier learning curve and > it doesn't have the "non-native" feel of Git on Windows. > Regarding the specific points you mentioned: aren't those just Github > features whose current implementation you like instead of Hg/Git > differences? > > In any case, here's my 2c regarding source: > > - There seems to be a consensus to move to a DVCS. Nobody wants to stay > with SVN > - As others said, after the release might be a good time to do the move > - IMO, the decision should be done first by the committers and, if > there isn't a clear winner, by the contributors. How about a poll? > > And regarding the site (in no particular order): > > - I've said it before: the current state of NH identity is just > terrible. Searches for "nhibernate" "nhibernate source" "nhibernate bug > tracker" "nhibernate docs" and "nhibernate binaries" should all point to a > unified site. > - I don't have anything against Jira per se, but having it redirect to > an IP is just unprofessional > - SourceForge still feels like 1999. I really like Google Code, I > dislike CodePlex, and GitHub is meh. But the decision should be made by > those in charge of maintaining it. > > > Diego > > > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 08:03, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Frans, >> Git is more popular than hg. And we aren't considering centralized SCM >> >> And yes, there is a HUGE difference between sending a patch and sending a >> pull request. >> >> a) it is *significantly* easier to handle a pull request, because it is a >> single command, rather than a set of operations >> b) it allows you to have your own fork and easily merge future changes >> c) it means that Joe can pull from you, not just from the master feed >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Frans Bouma <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> > I actually do have a problem with hg. I think that Git is: >>> > a) more popular >>> >>> than what, subversion? Perforce? CVS? >>> >>> > b) GitHub has tremendous pull in terms of encouraging contributions. >>> > c) I saw a huge spike in the amount of people contributing once I moved >>> to >>> > github. >>> >>> I have a hard time believing that the scc system used is of any >>> relevance whether a developer is capable of contributing any code. I >>> mean: >>> it's not as if someone who changes some code in his own branch is >>> suddenly >>> able to commit those changes as well: the change has to be reviewed, >>> tested, >>> agreed upon and then it's committed. A svn patch is just as simple for >>> that >>> than any other patch. >>> >>> I don't deny what you saw on ravendb stuff, I just find it a >>> 'coincidence' rather than a correlated event. >>> >>> FB >>> >>> > >>> > >>> > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > And move the code in CodePlex... >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Fabio Maulo >>> > >>> > >>> > El 02/11/2010, a las 16:38, Jorge <[email protected]> escribió: >>> > >>> > >>> > > Hello there, >>> > > >>> > > I am in the process of downloading the code via SVN, and it is >>> > taking >>> > > a very long time. >>> > > >>> > > Can someone please enable Git repo in sourceforge, or better >>> yet, >>> > move >>> > > code to Github? >>> > > >>> > > Respectfully yours, >>> > > Jorge >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >> >
