+1 for github github is much better option than codeplex+hg (in my opinion)
The intregated support and management of pull requests and the whole community aspect around the source code repositories is a real boost to contribution and easy managment. If you really prefer mercurial than go with bitbucket and you get some of the good this github brings. >From a pure capability and tooling perspective I think Mercurial is a little better (at least on windows) but I think that is compensated by the how great github. just my 2 cents. /Torkel On 3 Nov, 13:36, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > sorry NUnit is in launchpad. > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Moq svn (Google code) > > NServiceBus svn + git (Source forge + GitHub) <== Official in SVN > > Rhino.ServiceBus git (GitHub) > > uNhAddIns Hg (Google code) > > SharpTestsEx Hg (Code Plex) > > ConfORM Hg (Google Code) > > NUnit svn (SourceForge) > > Castle git (GitHub) > > Spring svn (custom) > > NHibernate svn (SourceForge) > > NHibernate.Validator svn (SourceForge) > > NHibernate.Spatial svn (SourceForge) > > NHibernate.Search svn (SourceForge) > > NewtonJson svn (CodePlex) > > Log4Net svn (Apache) > > Lucene svn (Apache) > > Re-Linq svn (custom + CodePlex only for deploy) > > ANTLR svn (Custom) > > SharpMap svn (Code Plex) > > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> I mean popular in the sense that out of the .NET projects that I follow > >> that uses DVCS, most use Git. > > >> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> I know lot of OSS using SVN more than Git... btw.. > >>> Mercurial is supported by Bitbucket, Google Code, SourceForge, CodePlex > >>> Please give me a more detailed definition of "popular" since its > >>> translation in Italian and in Spanish can be interpreted as "not used only > >>> by elite". > > >>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> Diego, > >>>> I know of a LOT of OSS projects which are using Git > >>>> I know of very few using HG. > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Diego Mijelshon <[email protected] > >>>> > wrote: > > >>>>> Oren, > > >>>>> What stats do you use to say Git is more popular? > >>>>> I think they both have lots of followers. > > >>>>> I'm slightly biased towards HG, because it has an easier learning curve > >>>>> and it doesn't have the "non-native" feel of Git on Windows. > >>>>> Regarding the specific points you mentioned: aren't those just Github > >>>>> features whose current implementation you like instead of Hg/Git > >>>>> differences? > > >>>>> In any case, here's my 2c regarding source: > > >>>>> - There seems to be a consensus to move to a DVCS. Nobody wants to > >>>>> stay with SVN > >>>>> - As others said, after the release might be a good time to do the > >>>>> move > >>>>> - IMO, the decision should be done first by the committers and, if > >>>>> there isn't a clear winner, by the contributors. How about a poll? > > >>>>> And regarding the site (in no particular order): > > >>>>> - I've said it before: the current state of NH identity is just > >>>>> terrible. Searches for "nhibernate" "nhibernate source" "nhibernate > >>>>> bug > >>>>> tracker" "nhibernate docs" and "nhibernate binaries" should all > >>>>> point to a > >>>>> unified site. > >>>>> - I don't have anything against Jira per se, but having it redirect > >>>>> to an IP is just unprofessional > >>>>> - SourceForge still feels like 1999. I really like Google Code, I > >>>>> dislike CodePlex, and GitHub is meh. But the decision should be made > >>>>> by > >>>>> those in charge of maintaining it. > > >>>>> Diego > > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 08:03, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>> Frans, > >>>>>> Git is more popular than hg. And we aren't considering centralized SCM > > >>>>>> And yes, there is a HUGE difference between sending a patch and > >>>>>> sending a pull request. > > >>>>>> a) it is *significantly* easier to handle a pull request, because it > >>>>>> is a single command, rather than a set of operations > >>>>>> b) it allows you to have your own fork and easily merge future changes > >>>>>> c) it means that Joe can pull from you, not just from the master feed > > >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Frans Bouma <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > I actually do have a problem with hg. I think that Git is: > >>>>>>> > a) more popular > > >>>>>>> than what, subversion? Perforce? CVS? > > >>>>>>> > b) GitHub has tremendous pull in terms of encouraging > >>>>>>> contributions. > >>>>>>> > c) I saw a huge spike in the amount of people contributing once I > >>>>>>> moved to > >>>>>>> > github. > > >>>>>>> I have a hard time believing that the scc system used is of > >>>>>>> any > >>>>>>> relevance whether a developer is capable of contributing any code. I > >>>>>>> mean: > >>>>>>> it's not as if someone who changes some code in his own branch is > >>>>>>> suddenly > >>>>>>> able to commit those changes as well: the change has to be reviewed, > >>>>>>> tested, > >>>>>>> agreed upon and then it's committed. A svn patch is just as simple > >>>>>>> for that > >>>>>>> than any other patch. > > >>>>>>> I don't deny what you saw on ravendb stuff, I just find it a > >>>>>>> 'coincidence' rather than a correlated event. > > >>>>>>> FB > > >>>>>>> > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > And move the code in CodePlex... > > >>>>>>> > -- > >>>>>>> > Fabio Maulo > > >>>>>>> > El 02/11/2010, a las 16:38, Jorge <[email protected]> > >>>>>>> escribió: > > >>>>>>> > > Hello there, > > >>>>>>> > > I am in the process of downloading the code via SVN, and it > >>>>>>> is > >>>>>>> > taking > >>>>>>> > > a very long time. > > >>>>>>> > > Can someone please enable Git repo in sourceforge, or > >>>>>>> better yet, > >>>>>>> > move > >>>>>>> > > code to Github? > > >>>>>>> > > Respectfully yours, > >>>>>>> > > Jorge > > >>> -- > >>> Fabio Maulo > > > -- > > Fabio Maulo > > -- > Fabio Maulo
