I vote for the skip and take version... they all need to be translated anyway why not pick something that is easy to remember On Feb 6, 2011 11:23 AM, "Patrick Earl" <[email protected]> wrote: > Based on the feedback so far, it seems like the simpler syntax is more > desired. What are people's preferences around the following two > options? > > SKIP x TAKE y > OFFSET x LIMIT y > > Seems like Fabio and Diego prefer the first two. I'm also liking the > skip and take a bit more at this point, since it's more descriptive, > despite being less standard from a SQL perspective. Other's thoughts? > > Patrick Earl
- [nhibernate-development] Limit and Offset support in... Patrick Earl
- Re: [nhibernate-development] Limit and Offset s... Richard Birkby
- AW: Re: [nhibernate-development] Limit and ... Wenig, Stefan
- Re: AW: Re: [nhibernate-development] Li... Richard Brown (gmail)
- Re: AW: Re: [nhibernate-development... Patrick Earl
- Re: AW: Re: [nhibernate-develo... Patrick Earl
- Re: AW: Re: [nhibernate-de... Hoang Tang
- Re: AW: Re: [nhibernat... Stephen Bohlen
- Re: AW: Re: [nhibernate-de... Fabio Maulo
- Re: AW: Re: [nhibernat... Stephen Bohlen
- Re: AW: Re: [nhibernat... Patrick Earl
- [nhibernate-developmen... Michael Teper
- Re: [nhibernate-develo... Fabio Maulo
- Re: [nhibernate-develo... Diego Mijelshon
- Re: AW: Re: [nhibernat... Fabio Maulo
- Re: AW: Re: [nhibernat... Patrick Earl
- Re: AW: Re: [nhibernat... Patrick Earl
