I really like that structure. +1
Steve Bohlen [email protected] http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com http://twitter.com/sbohlen On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > Put it at the begin of the query. > It will be clear and, over all, more easy to implement (read it as > 'grammar'). > Examples: > SKIPING 50 TAKING 25 select e.Name, e.Surname from Employee e ...... > SKIPING 50 TAKING 25 from Employee > from Users u where u.Employee in (TAKING 25 from Employee e order by > e.Salary desc) > > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Patrick Earl <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Based on the feedback so far, it seems like the simpler syntax is more >> desired. What are people's preferences around the following two >> options? >> >> SKIP x TAKE y >> OFFSET x LIMIT y >> >> Seems like Fabio and Diego prefer the first two. I'm also liking the >> skip and take a bit more at this point, since it's more descriptive, >> despite being less standard from a SQL perspective. Other's thoughts? >> >> Patrick Earl >> > > > > -- > Fabio Maulo > >
