I’m largely ambivalent about ‘which’ DVCS we use. I have only briefly tried GIT (and didn’t love it ... but did love the speed), and I haven’t used Mercurial, so I cannot contrast.
I get the general impression (from previous rounds of this discussion) that the most popular opinion that was voiced was for github. I believe SF can host both GIT and Mercurial ... but I take it (just to be clear) that most people are suggesting both moving to GIT _and_ moving the host from SourceForge to github? From: Stephen Bohlen Sent: Monday, July 04, 2011 1:23 AM To: nhibernate-development Subject: Re: [nhibernate-development] DVCS Rerevisited FYI, after NH 3.2 goes GA we *will* be moving the authoritative repo to a DVCS platform. Steve Bohlen [email protected] http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com http://twitter.com/sbohlen On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Ramon Smits <[email protected]> wrote: I'm for github too
